- Hate intrusive adobe products alternative to acrobat reader install#
- Hate intrusive adobe products alternative to acrobat reader upgrade#
- Hate intrusive adobe products alternative to acrobat reader software#
You may be surprised to learn that Acrobat accounts for more revenue and profitability than Photoshop. Instead reserving it for a secondary app like Acrobat There’s nothing anyone can do about it so keep your mouth shut and follow the rest of us.Īctivation is here to stay, so get used to it (I wonder why Intuit pulled it then?)
If you’re just speculating and spouting wild hypotheticals that have as much likelihood of coming to pass as me winning the lottery than keep them to your selves.Ĭomplaining about activation is like complaining about taxes – only where taxes are concerned, we all agree, you can complain. If you have a legitimate gripe after using activation then by all means, post it here. If there were any major problems with the activation beta test in AU (AU seems to get to be the guinea pg for all this stuff don’t they?) then I’m sure Adobe would not be putting it in their flagship application, instead reserving it for a secondary app like Acrobat. You either work with it or you purchase another product, it’s that simple. We have a saying in Boston, you could be hit by a big yellow bus tomorrow and there’s not a thing you can do about it. Playing chicken little won’t solve anything. If Microsoft was that easy then Adobe will be twice as easy (if that’s even possible).
Hate intrusive adobe products alternative to acrobat reader install#
They removed the activation on a laptop that I no longer used and I was able to install Office 2000 on a second desktop system with no problems. I called the number provided with the warning dialog, and in five minutes I was up and running with no problems. I once exceeded the activation limit for Office 2000 (I was using the academic version which was, along with the AU version, being used to test activation). If your story seems remotely legit then you’re on your way. Even with Microsoft, all it takes is a simple phone call.
Hate intrusive adobe products alternative to acrobat reader upgrade#
How will an upgrade work along with using two computers? Besides, I love the line: it represents the spirit of Adobes Product License Agreement. OR how about and we will be evaluating all possibilities going forward That means they are going to figure out another way to soak it to us. Where does the authorized 2 computers come from and how in the world can one not run two simultaneously? More importantly, a lot of people go through a hardware change before a new product release. Product activation opens the door for Adobe to offer more tailored terms to our customers, and we will be evaluating all possibilities going forward. Q: What about customers who have more than one computer at home? Will Adobe be offering a "family license"?Ī: Adobe is committed to offering the most flexible user options. Activation is an interactive extension of existing licensing terms and as such represents the spirit of Adobe’s Product License Agreement. Q: Does product activation represent a change in licensing terms? A: No. Adobes web site states the following:ĭoes activation change the licensing terms?
This is just a way of squeezing money from their users.Īs a photographer I have habitually used a home computer and a laptop that I take on the road with me.
Hate intrusive adobe products alternative to acrobat reader software#
Quicken had a huge revolt because of their activation policy and I am going to guess there are going to be a LOT of unhappy Photoshop users who may opt for less expensive and about as good photo manipulation software for digital images. This is the very reason I left Quickens Turbo Tax for TaxCut. Business 101, anyone?Īctivation ticks me off. Regardless of my eventual decision, the Adobe ‘brand’ has been harmed, and I am far more receptive to alternatives today than I was yesterday. I am actively looking for alternatives to ‘Corporate-ware’, and perhaps I will find it before I am forced to upgrade to XP and PhotoShop CS. I have no wish to be policed after paying hundreds of dollars for software, first by Microsoft, and now by Adobe. I am tired of being suspiciously eyed every time I replace my hard drive. Until I am assured that re-activation is as painless as activation, I am disinterested in the product. Why are individual users the ones they choose to lean on? If the prices of future versions don’t come down, should we assume the ‘Piracy makes for higher prices’ was a lie? Adobe loses money far more often at the hands of people and pirates abusing Volume Licensing than the person who buys a retail box. Now we have activation *and* higher prices. We have been told many times of the ‘tax’ we have paid because of piracy, in the form of higher prices.
0 kommentar(er)
